11.25.08

Russian Financial Analyst Predicts Decline And Breakup Of U.S.–Aknowledges ‘Secret’ Amero Agreement

Posted in Banking, Nationalization, North American Union at 4:13 pm by Administrator

From Russian News & Information Agency–Novosti, 24 November 2008: http://en.rian.ru/world/20081124/118512713.html

MOSCOW, November 24 (RIA Novosti) – A leading Russian political analyst has said the economic turmoil in the United States has confirmed his long-held view that the country is heading for collapse, and will divide into separate parts.

Professor Igor Panarin said in an interview with the respected daily Izvestia published on Monday: “The dollar is not secured by anything. The country’s foreign debt has grown like an avalanche, even though in the early 1980s there was no debt. By 1998, when I first made my prediction, it had exceeded $2 trillion. Now it is more than 11 trillion. This is a pyramid that can only collapse.”

The paper said Panarin’s dire predictions for the U.S. economy, initially made at an international conference in Australia 10 years ago at a time when the economy appeared strong, have been given more credence by this year’s events.

When asked when the U.S. economy would collapse, Panarin said: “It is already collapsing. Due to the financial crisis, three of the largest and oldest five banks on Wall Street have already ceased to exist, and two are barely surviving. Their losses are the biggest in history. Now what we will see is a change in the regulatory system on a global financial scale: America will no longer be the world’s financial regulator.”

When asked who would replace the U.S. in regulating world markets, he said: “Two countries could assume this role: China, with its vast reserves, and Russia, which could play the role of a regulator in Eurasia.”

Asked why he expected the U.S. to break up into separate parts, he said: “A whole range of reasons. Firstly, the financial problems in the U.S. will get worse. Millions of citizens there have lost their savings. Prices and unemployment are on the rise. General Motors and Ford are on the verge of collapse, and this means that whole cities will be left without work. Governors are already insistently demanding money from the federal center. Dissatisfaction is growing, and at the moment it is only being held back by the elections and the hope that Obama can work miracles. But by spring, it will be clear that there are no miracles.”

He also cited the “vulnerable political setup”, “lack of unified national laws”, and “divisions among the elite, which have become clear in these crisis conditions.”

He predicted that the U.S. will break up into six parts – the Pacific coast, with its growing Chinese population; the South, with its Hispanics; Texas, where independence movements are on the rise; the Atlantic coast, with its distinct and separate mentality; five of the poorer central states with their large Native American populations; and the northern states, where the influence from Canada is strong.

He even suggested that “we could claim Alaska – it was only granted on lease, after all.”
On the fate of the U.S. dollar, he said: “In 2006 a secret agreement was reached between Canada, Mexico and the U.S. on a common Amero currency as a new monetary unit. This could signal preparations to replace the dollar. The one-hundred dollar bills that have flooded the world could be simply frozen. Under the pretext, let’s say, that terrorists are forging them and they need to be checked.”

When asked how Russia should react to his vision of the future, Panarin said: “Develop the ruble as a regional currency. Create a fully functioning oil exchange, trading in rubles… We must break the strings tying us to the financial Titanic, which in my view will soon sink.”

Panarin, 60, is a professor at the Diplomatic Academy of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and has authored several books on information warfare.

11.18.08

Paulson Appears To Announce Nationalization of Banks

Posted in Banking, Nationalization at 11:54 pm by Administrator

In a Nov 18 story by one of its economic writers, AP identified an about face by Treasury Secretary Paulson from the previous, highly criticized “no-strings” infusion of cash to the U.S. banking industry, to a nationalistic buy in.

Many conservative financial analysts, particularly FOX’s Neil Cavuto, hammered away at the notion of free money with no conditions. With AIG executives romping around posh resorts and chicken-counting mortgage banks allegedly planning to squat on the fresh green, Paulson and Bernanke pivoted to a seemingly more sinister position–U.S. Government ownership in the banking private sector.

Jeannine Aversa’s (AP) report quoted the New York Post, New York Times and Paulson:

In a profile published Tuesday in The Washington Post, Paulson, who is overseeing the bailout program for the Bush administration, said he was also working on a proposal that would allow the government to take over a wide range of financial institutions — not just banks — that are in danger of collapse.

Last week, Paulson changed course and announced that the government would not use any of the $700 billion to buy rotten mortgages and other bad assets from banks. That had been the centerpiece of the plan when Paulson and Bernanke originally pitched it to lawmakers.

“Our assessment … is that this is not the most effective way” to use the bailout money, Paulson said at that time.

In an op-ed published Tuesday in The New York Times, Paulson wrote: “If we have learned anything throughout this year, we have learned that this financial crisis is unpredictable and difficult to counteract. We decided it was prudent to reserve our (Troubled Asset Relief Program) money, maintaining not only our flexibility, but also that of the next administration.”

Still, Paulson said that “recovery will happen much, much faster than it would have had we not used TARP to stabilize our system.”

Paulson said last week the department would focus on rolling out a capital injection program to pour $250 billion into banks in return for partial ownership stakes in them. In the Times on Tuesday, he explained that “stronger capitalization is essential to increasing lending, which is vital to economic recovery.”

As conservatives pushed the “socialist” button pre-election, liberals retorted, “what do you call this Republican bank bailout?” Perhaps Paulson decided it was time to show the world what’s in the bag.

Editor’s note: AmeroCurrency.com has been warning for almost three years, the wisest exercise in a government imposing a desired major change on a population is convincing the population to beg for it. The problem the population faces is designed to suit the “solution” the power wants to impose.

If the Alan Greenspans and the Barney Franks’ of the world didn’t see this (these) mess coming, they were either inept or complicit. The, supposed, smartest minds in the country drove our economy into the ground, and their first solution as the “problem” revealed itself was to dilute our currency. Now, the answer appears to be, dilute the currency and let the government in on ownership of the banks.

Buyer beware.