Government Conspiracy
" We're from the Government--
We're here to help..."
We're here to help..."
| Excerpted from a World Net Daily article by Dr. Jerome Corsi |
| "If the impulse and opportunity be suffered to coincide, we well know that neither moral nor religious motives can be relied on as an adequate control."--James Madison, The Federalist Papers |
| AmeroCurrency and AmeroCurrency.com are Trademarks and Services Marks All Rights Reserved - Copyright © 2006-2009 |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
Particularly damaging for Canadian Prime Minister StephenHarper
(and the Canadian SPP summit) was the admission that Canadian
police had infiltrated protesters with undercover agents who acted as
provocateurs.
The controversy began when a video was posted on YouTube.com
showing three masked people confronted in Montebello by peaceful
protesters and accused of being police infiltrators who wanted to start
a riot to discredit the demonstration.
One of the three provocateurs clearly has a rock in his hand.
Analysis of the video showed the footwear of the masked people bore
markings on the soles that matched the footwear worn by the heavily
riot-geared Sûreté du Québec police at the scene.
On Thursday last week, the Sûreté du Québec was forced to admit the
three provocateurs in the YouTube.com video were police officers who
disguised themselves as protestors at the SPP summit in Montebello.
A video on YouTube.com shows, in French (language), the press
conference in which the Sûreté du Québec made the admission,
ending three-days of denials by the Harper government .
In Canada, the Montebello meeting is now being called the “Jellybean”
summit in reference to Harper’s comment at the final press conference
that the closed meetings had discussed standardizing jellybean
regulation in Canada and the United States.
In Canada, the Montebello meeting is now being called the “Jellybean”
summit in reference to Harper’s comment at the final press conference
that the closed meetings had discussed standardizing jellybean
regulation in Canada and the United States.
In response to a question from a Fox News reporter, all three leaders
ridiculed the idea that the SPP meetings were a prelude to a European
Union-style North American Union or that there were plans to build a
continental NAFTA Superhighway.
Harper referenced a business leader on the North American
Competitiveness Council who in the closed meetings indicated he
manufactures jelly beans, and the rules for jelly bean contents are
different in Canada and the United States, forcing the manufacturer to
maintain two separate inventories.
Harper minimized the significance of the closed-door SPP meetings by
asking rhetorically, “Is the sovereignty of Canada going to fall apart if
we standardize the jelly bean? I don’t think so.”
Murry Dobbin, a Vancouver author and journalist, rebutted Harper on a
Canadian webblog, writing if Stockwell Day, Canada’s public safety
minister, and Harper “believe they can continue to portray the SPP as
the jelly-bean initiative, they may be in for a nasty surprise. All the
opposition parties have taken a critical stand on SPP and deep
integration in general.”
Canada’s New Democratic Party, or NDP, a progressive party led by
Jack Layton, is running on its homepage an article entitled, “Blowing
the Whistle on SPP: Deep concern over deep integration.”
The article charges, “The Security and Prosperity Partnership is the
latest move toward continental economic and social integration aimed
at establishing common policies between Canada, the United States
and Mexico in 300 policy areas, including: environmental protection,
security, energy, food and health standards, foreign affairs, military and
immigration.”
The article is highlighted by a banner with a borderless map of North
America revealing throughout a cut-away of an American flag. The
banner reads: “Stop the SPP. Canadians deserve a say. Parliament
needs to vote.”
The NDP website claims, “The Liberals started SPP, Harper’s
Conservatives are implementing it, and Jack Layton and the NDP want
to stop it.”
NDP Member of Parliament Peter Julian was quoted by the Canadian
Press as telling a Canadian community forum that the Security and
Prosperity Partnership does not offer security or prosperity for the
majority of Canadians.
According to the Leader-Post in Canada, Julian charged, “SPP is only
a partnership for the political leaders of Canada, the U.S. and Mexico
and 30 major corporate chief executives gathered around them as their
executive advisers. Everyone else, including the elected legislatures of
the three countries, has been systematically excluded.”
Julian detailed 10 reasons why the “largely secret, unaccountable and
antidemocratic SPP exercise” should be a concern to ordinary
Canadians.
Among Julian’s concerns is that regulatory “integrating” and
“harmonizing” under SPP has resulted in a lowering of standards for
pesticide use in food production. Canada, he said, is giving in to
demands by North American multi-national corporations to have SPP
adopt U.S. standards. Julian believes that will expose Canadian
consumers to chemical toxins in food that had previously been banned
in his country.
Other concerns expressed by Julian were that SPP represented a U.S.
grab for Canadian oil and fresh water resources that would be
redefined as North American instead of Canadian.
Connie Fogal, leader of the Canadian Action Party, told WND her
concerns were not just transparency, but sovereignty.
“Even if the public were allowed to observe the closed-door meetings
that took place between the globalist business leaders of the North
American Competitiveness Council and the SPP working group
bureaucrats, it would not be enough,” Fogel explained to WND.
“Our objection is the deep integration that is taking place under SPP,
and we would object to that deep integration even if the SPP working
group process were taken out from the shadows,” she continued. “What
we are seeing here is treason, a bureaucratic working group coup d’
etat. SPP would still be a coup d’etat, even if the meetings were
opened to the public.”
To make the point, the CAP website now posts a definition of treason
from Oran’s 1983 Dictionary of the Law, which describes it as a “citizen’
s actions to help a foreign government overthrow, make war against or
seriously injure the [parent nation].”
On its homepage, CAP then makes the argument, “In many nations, it
is also often considered treason to attempt or conspire to overthrow the
government, even if no foreign country is aided or involved by such an
endeavour.”
Surprising absence
Secretary Rice’s absence from the Montebello summit was considered
surprising, given her prominence in the SPP structure.
Documents published on the SPP website indicate the 20 SPP
trilateral working groups in the U.S. report to three cabinet secretaries.
Rice apparently is the most senior of the three cabinet secretaries in
the SPP structure, responsible for reporting overall SPP working group
activity to the White House through the National Security Council and
the Homeland Security Council.
Gutierrez and Chertoff appear to have secondary SPP positions to
Rice.
Gutierrez has line responsibility for U.S. bureaucrats participating in
“Prosperity Working Groups,” while Chertoff has line responsibility for
“Security Working Groups.”
Rice attended trilateral SPP meetings preparing for the Montebello
summit, including a Feb. 23 meeting in Ottawa, Canada, with
Canadian Foreign Minister Peter MacKay and Mexican Secretary of
Foreign Relations Patricia Espinosa.
The organizational chart, which has not been published by the U.S.
government, was confirmed by documents released to WND through a
Freedom of Information Act Request. It can be seen on page 81 of
WND Books’ “The Late Great USA: The Coming Merger of Mexico and
Canada.”
The SPP website does not reference the formal organizational chart in
its “Myths vs. Facts” document, which admits SPP is not a law or a
treaty while asserting it is a mere “dialogue” between three neighboring
countries.
At the press conference at the Montebello summit, Harper, a
conservative currently leading a minority government in Canada, tried
to deflect Canadian criticism of the SPP “deep integration” agenda to
his Liberal Party predecessor, former Prime Minister Paul Martin.
Ridiculing the idea of continental NAFTA Superhighways, Harper
quipped that no “interplanetary” superhighways were being planned
either.
Harper then tried to make clear SPP was not started by his government
but by the predecessor Liberal Party government headed by Paul
Martin.
Trying to downplay the importance of the SPP closed-door working
group sessions with the North American Competitiveness Council
businessmen, Harper commented, “So these are pragmatic, practical
discussions.”
In the next sentence, Harper added, “In fact, it was my predecessor in
the Liberal Party who initiated them.”
(and the Canadian SPP summit) was the admission that Canadian
police had infiltrated protesters with undercover agents who acted as
provocateurs.
The controversy began when a video was posted on YouTube.com
showing three masked people confronted in Montebello by peaceful
protesters and accused of being police infiltrators who wanted to start
a riot to discredit the demonstration.
One of the three provocateurs clearly has a rock in his hand.
Analysis of the video showed the footwear of the masked people bore
markings on the soles that matched the footwear worn by the heavily
riot-geared Sûreté du Québec police at the scene.
On Thursday last week, the Sûreté du Québec was forced to admit the
three provocateurs in the YouTube.com video were police officers who
disguised themselves as protestors at the SPP summit in Montebello.
A video on YouTube.com shows, in French (language), the press
conference in which the Sûreté du Québec made the admission,
ending three-days of denials by the Harper government .
In Canada, the Montebello meeting is now being called the “Jellybean”
summit in reference to Harper’s comment at the final press conference
that the closed meetings had discussed standardizing jellybean
regulation in Canada and the United States.
In Canada, the Montebello meeting is now being called the “Jellybean”
summit in reference to Harper’s comment at the final press conference
that the closed meetings had discussed standardizing jellybean
regulation in Canada and the United States.
In response to a question from a Fox News reporter, all three leaders
ridiculed the idea that the SPP meetings were a prelude to a European
Union-style North American Union or that there were plans to build a
continental NAFTA Superhighway.
Harper referenced a business leader on the North American
Competitiveness Council who in the closed meetings indicated he
manufactures jelly beans, and the rules for jelly bean contents are
different in Canada and the United States, forcing the manufacturer to
maintain two separate inventories.
Harper minimized the significance of the closed-door SPP meetings by
asking rhetorically, “Is the sovereignty of Canada going to fall apart if
we standardize the jelly bean? I don’t think so.”
Murry Dobbin, a Vancouver author and journalist, rebutted Harper on a
Canadian webblog, writing if Stockwell Day, Canada’s public safety
minister, and Harper “believe they can continue to portray the SPP as
the jelly-bean initiative, they may be in for a nasty surprise. All the
opposition parties have taken a critical stand on SPP and deep
integration in general.”
Canada’s New Democratic Party, or NDP, a progressive party led by
Jack Layton, is running on its homepage an article entitled, “Blowing
the Whistle on SPP: Deep concern over deep integration.”
The article charges, “The Security and Prosperity Partnership is the
latest move toward continental economic and social integration aimed
at establishing common policies between Canada, the United States
and Mexico in 300 policy areas, including: environmental protection,
security, energy, food and health standards, foreign affairs, military and
immigration.”
The article is highlighted by a banner with a borderless map of North
America revealing throughout a cut-away of an American flag. The
banner reads: “Stop the SPP. Canadians deserve a say. Parliament
needs to vote.”
The NDP website claims, “The Liberals started SPP, Harper’s
Conservatives are implementing it, and Jack Layton and the NDP want
to stop it.”
NDP Member of Parliament Peter Julian was quoted by the Canadian
Press as telling a Canadian community forum that the Security and
Prosperity Partnership does not offer security or prosperity for the
majority of Canadians.
According to the Leader-Post in Canada, Julian charged, “SPP is only
a partnership for the political leaders of Canada, the U.S. and Mexico
and 30 major corporate chief executives gathered around them as their
executive advisers. Everyone else, including the elected legislatures of
the three countries, has been systematically excluded.”
Julian detailed 10 reasons why the “largely secret, unaccountable and
antidemocratic SPP exercise” should be a concern to ordinary
Canadians.
Among Julian’s concerns is that regulatory “integrating” and
“harmonizing” under SPP has resulted in a lowering of standards for
pesticide use in food production. Canada, he said, is giving in to
demands by North American multi-national corporations to have SPP
adopt U.S. standards. Julian believes that will expose Canadian
consumers to chemical toxins in food that had previously been banned
in his country.
Other concerns expressed by Julian were that SPP represented a U.S.
grab for Canadian oil and fresh water resources that would be
redefined as North American instead of Canadian.
Connie Fogal, leader of the Canadian Action Party, told WND her
concerns were not just transparency, but sovereignty.
“Even if the public were allowed to observe the closed-door meetings
that took place between the globalist business leaders of the North
American Competitiveness Council and the SPP working group
bureaucrats, it would not be enough,” Fogel explained to WND.
“Our objection is the deep integration that is taking place under SPP,
and we would object to that deep integration even if the SPP working
group process were taken out from the shadows,” she continued. “What
we are seeing here is treason, a bureaucratic working group coup d’
etat. SPP would still be a coup d’etat, even if the meetings were
opened to the public.”
To make the point, the CAP website now posts a definition of treason
from Oran’s 1983 Dictionary of the Law, which describes it as a “citizen’
s actions to help a foreign government overthrow, make war against or
seriously injure the [parent nation].”
On its homepage, CAP then makes the argument, “In many nations, it
is also often considered treason to attempt or conspire to overthrow the
government, even if no foreign country is aided or involved by such an
endeavour.”
Surprising absence
Secretary Rice’s absence from the Montebello summit was considered
surprising, given her prominence in the SPP structure.
Documents published on the SPP website indicate the 20 SPP
trilateral working groups in the U.S. report to three cabinet secretaries.
Rice apparently is the most senior of the three cabinet secretaries in
the SPP structure, responsible for reporting overall SPP working group
activity to the White House through the National Security Council and
the Homeland Security Council.
Gutierrez and Chertoff appear to have secondary SPP positions to
Rice.
Gutierrez has line responsibility for U.S. bureaucrats participating in
“Prosperity Working Groups,” while Chertoff has line responsibility for
“Security Working Groups.”
Rice attended trilateral SPP meetings preparing for the Montebello
summit, including a Feb. 23 meeting in Ottawa, Canada, with
Canadian Foreign Minister Peter MacKay and Mexican Secretary of
Foreign Relations Patricia Espinosa.
The organizational chart, which has not been published by the U.S.
government, was confirmed by documents released to WND through a
Freedom of Information Act Request. It can be seen on page 81 of
WND Books’ “The Late Great USA: The Coming Merger of Mexico and
Canada.”
The SPP website does not reference the formal organizational chart in
its “Myths vs. Facts” document, which admits SPP is not a law or a
treaty while asserting it is a mere “dialogue” between three neighboring
countries.
At the press conference at the Montebello summit, Harper, a
conservative currently leading a minority government in Canada, tried
to deflect Canadian criticism of the SPP “deep integration” agenda to
his Liberal Party predecessor, former Prime Minister Paul Martin.
Ridiculing the idea of continental NAFTA Superhighways, Harper
quipped that no “interplanetary” superhighways were being planned
either.
Harper then tried to make clear SPP was not started by his government
but by the predecessor Liberal Party government headed by Paul
Martin.
Trying to downplay the importance of the SPP closed-door working
group sessions with the North American Competitiveness Council
businessmen, Harper commented, “So these are pragmatic, practical
discussions.”
In the next sentence, Harper added, “In fact, it was my predecessor in
the Liberal Party who initiated them.”